Wednesday, November 30, 2011

http://www.thisnation.com/question/051.html

Why Do We Elect Presidents This Way?

There are two primary reasons the Founders chose to select presidents via the electoral college instead of by direct, popular voting. The first reason was their lack of trust in the judgment of the people. They were fearful that a well-spoken but not well-intentioned individual could flatter the people and win their support. They hoped that a secondary body, such as the Electoral College, would not be susceptible to such attempts at manipulation. This reason for the Electoral College is virtually meaningless with changes that have "bound" electors to cast their votes for the candidate who wins the majority of the popular vote in each state.

The second reason for choosing presidents by electoral votes instead of by popular vote is to give the states a voice in the presidential election. The principle of federalism was and is a critical feature of the American political system. By placing states in this important position in the selection of the country's leader, the Framers sought to maintain the position of states as important entities in the American political system.

Imagine that presidential elections were not decided state-by-state, but rather by a nationwide popular vote. The significance of states and the candidates' competition for support in key, "swing" states would disappear. Candidates would be inclined to simply run nationwide ad campaigns and visit large population centers.



Only use this to bouch ideas for the debate do not use these pionts unless you think there good

Some ideas for the PF debate.

http://uselectionatlas.org/INFORMATION/INFORMATION/electcollege_procon.php


The Pro's and Con's of the Electoral College System

There have, in its 200 year history, been a number of critics and proposed reforms to the Electoral College system - most of them trying to eliminate it. But there are also staunch defenders of the Electoral College who, though perhaps less vocal than its critics, offer very powerful arguments in its favor.


Arguments Against the Electoral College

Those who object to the Electoral College system and favor a direct popular election of the president generally do so on four grounds:
  • the possibility of electing a minority president
  • the risk of so-called "faithless" Electors,
  • the possible role of the Electoral College in depressing voter turnout, and
  • its failure to accurately reflect the national popular will

Arguments for the Electoral College

Proponents of the Electoral College system normally defend it on the philosophical grounds that it:
  • contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president
  • enhances the status of minority interests,
  • contributes to the political stability of the nation by encouraging a two-party system, and
  • maintains a federal system of government and representation\



UPENN Competitors/Observers for this weekend:

Two things:
-Dont forget to sign up at the front office as a competitor of observer and
-Stop by the advancement office on the Second floor who's going to be taking pictures of and talking to us for an article on the team to go into the News Letter.

Evidence for the pro

http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/pages/answers.php

This is a lobbying group for popular vote.  Good for the pro
http://elections.gmu.edu/voter_turnout.htm( By Doctor Micheal Mcdonald a member of the public and International Affairs): From 2000 to 2010 Amount of people eligible to vote raised slowly from 54 percent to 63 percent. In 2010 90,682,986 people voted in America

Smart device users

Attention debators with a smart device please install apps that can help you research: bbc, brookings, nytimes, are all free apps for smartphones and other devices

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Fundraising

Attn. Debators: Please remember to bring in $2-3 tommorrow for the fundraiser on Thursday! Thankyou